home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Software Vault: The Gold Collection
/
Software Vault - The Gold Collection (American Databankers) (1993).ISO
/
cdr20
/
fedzone.zip
/
INTRO.TXT
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-01-21
|
13KB
|
363 lines
Introduction
In the late Spring of the year 1990, our small beach town in
Northern California was visited by a minor political controversy.
A local writer for the weekly newspaper, a man named Kirby
Ferris, had a number of neighbors buzzing about his recent
sequence of articles challenging the 16th Amendment, the
so-called "income tax" amendment in the U.S. Constitution. It
seems that Kirby had come across some huge collection of
documents which allegedly proved that the 16th Amendment was
never ratified. Instead of obtaining the required approval of 36
State legislatures, the proposed amendment was simply "declared"
ratified on February 25, 1913 by Philander C. Knox, a man who
purported to be Secretary of State. Kirby Ferris had, evidently,
visited one of the men responsible for assembling this collection
of 17,000 State-certified documents and returned entirely
convinced that the so-called 16th Amendment was a complete and
total fraud. The man he visited was Martin J. "Red" Beckman, a
Montana rancher whose name now appears as co-author with Bill
Benson on the cover of The Law That Never Was, a book that has
already become a classic in American historical literature.
Up to that point in time, I had not been much of a Ferris
fan. Too often for me, his style bordered on being too
inflammatory and lacking necessary details. After all, Kirby had
spent his youth surfing waves, drinking beer, and chasing
bikinis. When this little controversy erupted, I made no secret
of my bachelor's degree in Political Science from UCLA, and my
master's degree from the University of California at Irvine in
public administration. Trotting out these credentials, of
course, was invariably my preface to answering the several
questions which friends and neighbors put to me about Kirby's
allegations, as if to underscore my obvious qualifications to
repudiate Kirby's claims. "If there's a problem, Congress will
just fix it," I must have said more times than I care to admit.
One day at breakfast in the Parkside Cafe, a favorite hang-
out for all the "locals", the same conversation began again, this
time with a Vietnam War veteran by the name of Mike Taylor. Mike
is an intense man, with fierce convictions, a booming voice, a
few lingering effects of combat shell shock, and a habit of
getting right to the point. "What do you think of Kirby's
columns on income tax?" he queried. Again, as if to practice a
polished art, I repeated the same old answer one more time,
"Congress will just fix it, if there really is a problem with the
16th Amendment." The answer had worked in the past; there was
no reason why it wouldn't work on Mike too. Wrong! Mike shot
right back, "OK. You're so smart. How is Congress going to fix
it?" he retorted. "They'll pass a law. How else do you think
they would fix it?" I answered, somewhat surprised from pride to
be challenged so directly. And then Mike lowered the boom, "Are
you telling me that Congress can amend the Constitution by
passing a law? Is that what you're telling me?"
intro 1 of 6
The Federal Zone:
My jaw fell, as if to begin my next sentence, but no words
came out of my mouth. I knew that he had me. Congress cannot
amend the Constitution. Of course, Mike was right. In a feeble
attempt to recover, I retreated by admitting that two-thirds of
the States were required to amend the Constitution, and that
Congress alone did not have the power to do so. Then Mike
delivered the knockout punch, "It takes three-fourths of the
States to amend the Constitution, Mitch, not two-thirds." I was
had. All those years in school, all those high school civics
classes, all those papers on political theory, and all those
months of management science had left me woefully unprepared to
spar with Mike when it came to the Supreme Law of our Land. The
lesson was a good one, one that I will never forget for the rest
of my days.
My embarrassed defeat was a terrific motivation. I went to
work ordering books and reading everything I could get my hands
on. A purchase order flew up to Red Beckman in Billings,
Montana. Within a week I was devouring my own copy of The Law
That Never Was. I had to repent for my errors, or so my
religious training had led me to believe. The book was a turning
point, in more ways than one. I knew enough about the rules of
evidence to question every page. "How could this problem have
gone undetected for such a very long time?" I asked myself. Here
were allegations which appeared to undermine a major source of
revenue for the entire federal government of the United States.
I needed more proof.
I wrote to Kirby and explained my situation. It had been
many years since my college political activism. I was now a
senior systems consultant for a major investment bank in San
Francisco, with almost 20 years of computer experience under my
belt. I was often seen blending in among the "grey men" of the
financial district, not too far from a regional Federal Reserve
Bank. If I was going to take this problem very seriously and, in
particular, if I was ever going to do anything about the 16th
Amendment fraud, then I was going to need something more than a
printed book from some Montana rancher I had never met. After
all, with enough money, anybody can put ink to paper and put
almost anything into circulation these days. I needed something
more; I needed material evidence, as they call it in court rooms
and in law schools -- material evidence, not hearsay, and
certainly not unsubstantiated allegations that a massive fiscal
fraud had been perpetrated on the American people for more than
two generations.
Kirby rose to the occasion. "Tell me what you need," he
said. I thought about it and invited him to come over for
coffee. If there really were 17,000 documents, all officially
certified by the Secretaries of State in the Capitol buildings of
48 of the United States***, there was no point in plowing through
such a huge mound of paperwork. Paperwork was something which I
put somewhere below a necessary evil. We put our heads together
and came up with a plan. The feds have admitted in writing that
intro 2 of 6
Introduction
6 States did not ratify the 16th Amendment. Since three-fourths
of the States were required to ratify it, the amendment could
have passed with at most 12 States opposing it. If we could find
only 7 additional States which obviously failed to ratify the
amendment, that would make a total of 13 NAY's, and we would have
defeated the "income tax". What a tantalizing thought! Before
the night was over, we had our list of "The Dirty Seven", as
Kirby liked to call them.
Kirby Ferris went home to call Red Beckman. Two days later,
Kirby left a short note on my front door: Red Beckman had agreed
to photocopy all the relevant documents for The Dirty Seven
States, and would ship them to us as soon as the copying was
done. Within a week, two large cardboard boxes were sitting on
my front porch when I returned home from work. There it was, the
evidence I needed. It was incontrovertible: the 16th Amendment
was never ratified. The act of declaring it ratified was an act
of outright fraud by Secretary of State Philander C. Knox, a man
who was sworn to obey the Constitution. This was an awesome
discovery.
The events which have transpired since that moment have
literally changed my life. I have filed formal petitions with
two Representatives in the Congress of the United States. A
detailed notice of fraud and deception has been served on all the
governors of the 50 States. I have requested a Grand Jury
investigation into the fraud committed by Secretary of State
Philander C. Knox. I have studied and debated and learned
everything I could about the laws and regulations which bear on
this question. It has been an exhilarating and challenging
experience. Almost all of the opposition has come from
government personnel, mostly officials of the Internal Revenue
Service. That opposition has been most instructive.
For those of you who may not know exactly how and where the
U.S. Constitution is relevant to this subject matter, the text of
the failed 16th Amendment follows:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on
incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment
among the several States, and without regard to any census
or enumeration.
[Constitution for the United States of America]
[text of so-called 16th Amendment]
[emphasis added]
From the beginning, the U.S. Constitution has empowered Congress
to levy two different kinds of taxes: direct and indirect.
These are powers which Congress has always had, with or without
the so-called 16th Amendment. The power to levy indirect taxes
is authorized by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, as follows:
intro 3 of 6
The Federal Zone:
The Congress shall have Power To Lay and collect Taxes,
Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide
for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United
States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be
uniform throughout the United States; ....
[Constitution for the United States of America]
[Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1]
[emphasis added]
Federal excise taxes on the sale of gasoline and tires are
examples of indirect taxes. The requirement that indirect taxes
be uniform throughout the several States is known as the
"uniformity rule". The power to levy direct taxes is authorized
by two separate clauses of the Constitution, as follows:
Representatives and Direct Taxes shall be apportioned among
the several States which may be included within this Union,
according to their respective Numbers ....
[Constitution for the United States of America]
[Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3]
[emphasis added]
No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in
Proportion to the Census or Enumeration hereinbefore
directed to be taken.
[Constitution for the United States of America]
[Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4]
[emphasis added]
Thus, the requirement that direct taxes be apportioned was
considered by the Framers to be so important, it is mentioned
twice in the U.S. Constitution. This requirement is known as the
"apportionment rule", and its application is easy to understand.
If California has 10 percent of the nation's population, then
California's "portion" would be 10 percent of any direct tax
imposed by Congress. A "capitation" is another word for a direct
tax imposed on each "head" or person (caput is Latin for "head").
Federal taxes on personal property, or on the income of personal
property, are examples of direct taxes. Appendix Q shows the
State portions of a lawful direct tax that was levied by Congress
in the year 1798.
# # #
intro 4 of 6
Introduction
Reader's Notes:
intro 5 of 6
The Federal Zone:
Reader's Notes:
intro 6 of 6